By a similar reasoning, if there's chance that one's taqiyah could destroy the assumption of different believers, then taqiyah is verboten to such an individual.
Take for example the case of imam Husain (as). The character of Yazid is accepted and that we needn't come in its details here. Such an individual demands allegiance from imam Husain (as), the grandchild of the Holy Prophet of Islam and image of Muslim values and spiritual uprightness. Yazid had written to his governor of Madina to demand allegiance from Imam; and, if imam refused, then the governor was to send his head to capital of Syria.
So imam Husain (as) was cognizant of the results of his rejection of that demand. Still, he knew that if he did swear allegiance to Yazid, Muslims would assume that Yazid was the rightful successor of the Holy Prophet (saw), and therefore all the debaucheries of Yazid would become a vicinity of Islam. In short, Islam would are utterly ugly if imam Husain (as) had accepted Yazid because the legal swayer of the Holy Prophet.
Thus we tend to come back to the conclusion that if somebody is of such a standing that if he, resorted to taqiyah, others would be misled into un-Islamic tenets and beliefs, then the fundamental principle demands that he ought to sacrifice his life however save others from going wide. One or additional lives aren't as necessary collectively or additional people's religion and non secular delivery.
In the end, it ought to be reiterated that taqiyah isn't Associate in Nursing specialty of the Shi'as. each sect of Islam accepts the principle. Quotations from Sahih Bukhari and Sunni Commentaries of the Qur’an are given during this article. imam Shafi'i allowed taqiyah even from the Muslims additionally as from the infidels. and every one nice students of Sunni sect, with none exception, have written that taqiyah is valid up to the Day of Judgment. Those interested. in elaborate references ought to see `Fulk- un-Najut' of Maulana Ali Muhammad and Maulana Amirud-Deen (Lahore, Pakistan) wherever lots of references are given from page eighty nine to page 116.
The Sunni scholar, Najmuddin Tufi Hanbali writes:
واعلم ان النزاع الطويل بينهم في التقية استدلالا وجوابا ذاهب هدرا ... اما التقية ... فلا مبالاة باثباتها وجوازها. وانما يكره عامة الناس لفظها كونها من مستندات الشيعة والا فالعالم مجبول على استعمالها وبعظهم يسميها مداراة وبعضهم مصانعة وبعضهم عقلا معيشيا ودل عليهما الشرع
.
"Know that the long arguments for and against taqiyah area unit useless …. however there's little doubt in its validity and lawfulness. Of course, folk don't like its name (taqiyah) as a result of it's been known with the Shi'as. Otherwise, the full world uses it naturally, although some decision it `tolerance', others name it as `diplomacy, and a few decision it `common sense'. And it's proven by proofs of Shari’ah (Islam). [65][32]
Keeping seeable, of these verses of the Qur’an and therefore the Prophet's traditions, and looking out in the least these historical facts within the lives of the Holy Prophet (saw), his companions and even previous Prophets additionally because the Sunni students, however is it that the Wahhabis maintain accusive the Shi'as of varied ridiculous beliefs then declaring that albeit the Shia's deny such beliefs they must not be believed as a result of they follow taqiyah?
Well, our books area unit promptly out there in Arabic, Persian, Urdu, Gujarati, Bengali, Hindi, Swahili, English and lots of different languages. they're on sale in Asian country, Iraq, Gulf States, Lebanon, Pakistan, India, geographical region, U.K, Canada, U.S.A and different countries. There area unit books on theology, jurisprudence, and social, moral and philosophical subjects. Some area unit meant for our children's education, others for teenagers and grownup up individuals. Let the Wahhabis turn out proof from our books in support of these unsupported accusations. sadly, they're going on continuation those foolish things from their own books and assume that they need vanquished the Shi'as!!
What will they are saying if we tend to begin writing that: "The Wahhabis believe that Shaykh Muhammad ibn `Abdul Wahhab was their prophet, which is why they hate the Holy Prophet, Muhammad ibn `Abdullah (saw) most and continually attempt to distract the Muslims from showing love and reference to the Holy Prophet of Islam (saw), however they are doing not dare to declare this belief brazenly as a result of then, they might be clad of Mecca and Medina and would lose their power-base."? however can they refute this allegation? {what can|what is going to|what's going to} be their defense after we will reject their words of mouth and their writings, as we are going to maintain declarative that it had been all a pack of lies simply to safeguard their hold on the sanctuaries of Mecca and Medina?
